Wow…the title of my post is vaguely related to the primary subject matter!
Great swaths of time I spend alone, either at home on the computer idly playing a Facebook game, or waiting until my ship in X2 makes it to its destination, or at work idly copying a test from an old report to a new one, or in the car when I don’t feel like listening to music or a podcast (believe it or not, that does happen), leads me to thinking about what I want to do with my life. What kind of legacy I want to leave. Yes, I have grand designs which I would love to see come to fruition, but I have more recently come to realize that I can’t bring them all about on my own. I would love to see reforms in government, education, intellectual property, entertainment, and subsets of all of these, but I need more focus if I’m to accomplish anything. I can surround and associate myself with people who have similar goals, similar ideas, similar ambitions, with focuses in all these areas, and hope for a critical mass to arise that will spur the changes that are necessary, and to recognize the changes that aren’t.
I decided a few months ago that I’d like to make my focus education. Specifically science education. This doesn’t mean I’m going to go off and become a science teacher, but I love telling people about sciency things, and learning about them myself.
I believe I’ve mentioned my idea for a lab/museum here before. A coworker whom I greatly respect, and who has done his share of work in particle physics and astrophysics disappointed me with his opinion that Wichita is too small a town for my idea to take off, but it hasn’t deterred me completely. He suggested I visit the Exploratorium in San Francisco, the SciTech Museum in Aurora, Illinois, and the “creatively named” Science Museum in Oklahoma City, and volunteer at one of them if possible, to get a feel for what it’s like. I did volunteer for the local SWE Engineering Expo this past February, and helped kids make slime all morning. It was more fun than I expected it to be, and more exhausting, too.
Some forays have been made into transforming education: MIT’s OpenCourseWare, iTunes U, Khan Academy, and I know there are many others. This is a good start, certainly, but I still feel that Internet lectures remove the importance of face-to-face interaction. And homework, or work in a classroom, to indicate and measure a student’s grasp of a particular concept, is difficult, if not impossible, to “grade” or judge in an automated way. Traditional education is big business, and students are often merely a waste product (¶4).
I failed a class I took recently in a standard university setting. While I believed I had grasped the concepts presented, my final grade indicates otherwise. It wasn’t actually a failing grade, but I don’t expect I will be able to move forward in the field until I understand what I didn’t. I would value a tutor, or a classroom setting in which I could go through the problems in detail, noting and explaining my mistakes. That was the primary problem with the course I took. I’d see a “3″ at the top of my page, and know that my solution was deficient in some way (a “5″ indicated a perfect score on the homework), and I’d have to compare it with the barely legible solutions provided by the professor to determine the source of my error. When problems were discussed in class, her handwriting was complimented by a verbal explanation, so everything she explained made sense.
To change the subject, I’ll give an example regarding the current state of scientific education, and it is just as much a linguistic issue as it is anything else: the words “theory” and “law”. We have the “theory of evolution”, the “theory of relativity”, and the “law of gravity”. Both are terms which must be understood by a scientific definition rather than their colloquial ones.
A Physical Law:
- Explains and predicts behavior of a system.
- Cannot be “proven or disproven”; has been repeatedly verified, but its scope can be narrowed when new theories or principles are discovered.
A Scientific Theory:
- Explains and predicts behavior of a system.
- Can be disproven but not proven; has been verified, and is supported by evidence (experimental or empirical).
I am open to disagreement as to my summary of these terms.
Newton’s Laws of Motion have been displaced in the scientific community by Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity, yet they are still extremely accurate for the majority of systems encountered in everyday life, which is why the general public may find the distortion of spacetime in a gravity well, the universal speed limit of “the speed of light”, and quantum mechanics difficult to comprehend. The disconnect in understanding is a constant source of conflict in debates regarding climate science and protology.
I hope that we will be able to teach the average 10 year old calculus by 2364 (Star Trek: The Next Generation, When The Bough Breaks). In fact, I hope it will be sooner than that, and well before the technological singularity. I believe there are limits to the speed of human comprehension, and it may not be possible to cram what is today considered a full academic career into, say 8 years, but in order to spur innovation that might lead to technological marvels such as Type I energy generation/usage, artificial intelligence, interplanetary or interstellar travel, and concepts that do not even exist in science fiction, an individual’s ability to merge multiple concepts needs to expand, and in my view, the only means to that end is better education.
I would also like to see venues of learning similar to the fictional South Hampton Institute of Technology (Accepted). The unique trait that I’d like to see emulated is a selection of courses designed, and perhaps taught, by students themselves. In contrast to the school of non-stop partying as it began, it became an institution of learning the students enjoyed, because they were a part of it. Universities traditionally gain their funding through research grants. Their professors are paid more to research than to teach, the latter sometimes being an inconvenience, an ancillary task with their position. Some professors do enjoy the teaching, and they are the ones that you will find students gravitating towards, the ones who consistently get high marks on reviews, the ones who are truly enthusiastic about imparting their own knowledge to students. It is these who should gain recognition, who should be paid for this work rather than research. And if there is a subject they would like to research, it should not be difficult for such teachers to enlist the aid of other enthusiastic students.
I am not advocating an abandonment of “core” studies. I still believe it essential that everyone have a basic understanding of physics, biology, math, English (or the prevalent language or language of the area), chemistry, history, geography, etc. Most of this, however, can, and perhaps should, be covered by the time a student leaves elementary school, or perhaps middle school. While I think it’s absurd that there are people out there pretending to be functional members of society who don’t know that Delaware is a state, it is equally absurd to expect someone whose career aspirations are no higher than flipping burgers or filling potholes to have a bachelor’s degree from an accredited college or university.
High school should be a place students can decide where they wish their lives to take them. They like art? Allow them to enroll in as many art classes as they like, but be pragmatic without being discouraging about career prospects for their chosen field. This applies equally to pretty much any field. No matter the state of the economy, if it’s a bull or bear market, finding a job in one’s desired field isn’t necessarily possible. Not everyone gets to do what they want for a living, but if you’re lucky, and if you can find the right group to associate with, you might be able to carve a new niche.
Following that, on-the-job training is probably more valuable than further education. I could easily do my current job without the extra “book learnin’”. The main problem I see here is with maturity. It may be valuable to give people a year or two for walkabout, for trying their hand at art, to see if they can become a Hollywood or Broadway star, to “slum it” as it were, or wander Europe for a few months. There’s plenty of stuff that I would have loved to do, but after college I’m deep in debt, and the only way to crawl out of that is a job. And the job leads to a career, and I’ll be working until I’m 75 probably, and by then I’ll be too old to enjoy what I could have when I was 20.
Anyway, a college education would then become what it used to be, and what I believe it still should be: slightly elite, far more rigorous and specialized, and for those that take the academic journey, amenable to opportunities beyond the mundane.
I sit in my cubicle day after day, writing reports and test plans. I’m not saying that such work is unnecessary—industry regulations require it—but I was educated for something else, and my interests are only tangentially related to my education. I would probably enjoy my job if I was crunching numbers, actually running the tests I write, writing software, collaborating in a project larger than myself (the insular nature of my current work environment is frustrating to say the least), or shifting between endeavors on a semi-regular basis. If I were to buck rivets for a few weeks, that’d be fine by me, even exciting. I like a taste of everything.
I realize my brother and I are somewhat alike. When he worked at a music store, he strove to know everything about every instrument in the place, especially the ever-popular guitar. Got to be a pretty good player, too. He worked at a shoe store for a week or two, and in that time learned more than I would ever have thought there was to know about the foot. He worked at a Sears store, and seemed to know their tool catalog by heart just a few months later. He now works for an insulation company, and can rattle off energy efficiency statistics like nothing.
I, on the other hand, have worked very few jobs, and haven’t been proactive about learning other aspects of the industry in which I worked. At the hardware store, I swept floors, stocked shelves, and cut keys. I never ran the register because I was only a summer employee, but if I had pressed the boss, there is every chance I could have started to do more, and could now claim to have had at least a small bit of experience in retail. At Sprint, I wrote complex macros to consolidate large database dumps into a spreadsheet. After four weeks I had completed the task they expected would take me one, possibly two summers to work, but I sat and surfed the Internet the rest of the time instead of seeking out other opportunities. And now, at Cessna, I’ve burned through six bosses in two positions, and I’m still a bit unclear on what I’m supposed to be doing. This is mostly because regulations and oversight have changed dramatically in the past 10 years, I’m working with old material, and I do not have the option of scrapping this and starting over. Not that my entire job experience will be this dreary, but I need more encouragement than I’m getting to complete this piece of s***. Meanwhile I wish I had more experience in other departments in this company. I think the gulf between manufacturing and engineering is far too wide, and the gap between flight test and engineering isn’t much smaller (not that the FAA will let me behind the controls, but that’s a rant for another day). Part of it is that customer service, engineering, manufacturing, line flow, etc. don’t bother talking to each other, but part of it is that there’s very little cross-department experience outside of management (whom we lowly serfs usually see as disconnected, interchangeable talking heads anyway).
I’m deviating from the topic, though. Education, as it stands now, is fairly uniform throughout the developed world. In terms of style, at least. Discipline from parents for behavioral or academic issues seems harsh in anecdotes from Asia, and their higher scores in standardized tests seem to bear that out. Part of that is cultural. Yet the structure of the education—a formal school setting from roughly 6 years of age to 18—is pretty much the same.
Standardized tests are another thing I find slightly disturbing. It’s the only quantitative measure I can imagine for comparing one country to another, one district to another, one classroom to another, but there’s just something about them that feels wrong to me. I know that with No Child Left Behind, the much-derided (for good reason) government program, education was standards-based, and districts fought to “teach to the test” to get their funding. And the act set minimum goals, with no bonus for overachievement. “Gifted” students, with whom I was grouped in elementary school, are bored. I can attest to that from personal experience—I didn’t study one bit until my junior year of college because I wasn’t challenged until then.
Timing of the beginning and end of school days is also oddly skewed, at least in my view. The youngest children, who seem to be awake and eager to “do something” are jumping all over their groggy parents at 06:00, but school doesn’t start for them until 08:30 or 09:00. And high school students, in the middle of puberty, who probably require more sleep, are falling asleep in class because they have to be in their seat by 07:30 or earlier. This is precisely backwards.
Additionally, the start and end of the school year used to coincide with harvest schedules (so the story goes). It seems that there’s been creep of the academic calendar into the summer bounded by these dates, and when I did a search to see if the traditional calendar was tied to specific crops, I found pages full of studies indicating year-round school calendars showed no difference, or were detrimental, to students’ performance. It seems to me that the old way made sense, but neither should that deter school sessions during the summer months. With a dearth of the old chores, children who are too young to work but too old for daycare or a babysitter can get into a lot of trouble. Some structure might be desirable. Organized trips, even weekly, to a zoo or science museum or farm might be a joy to the kids, and a relief for parents.
Again, I don’t want to appear to be advocating something I’m not: parents should be parents to their kids, not pawn them off on the state or a private institution. I might say that, if you want your kid to be a part of such a program, you have to participate as well, perhaps as a chaperon on these outings. Someone can get off of work for one or two days a summer. Nor do I think that “helicopter parenting” is in any way a good thing. There’s a happy medium that isn’t portrayed in the media, because it’s not a story, but people often take news stories as the “norm”. Getting off topic again.
Dropouts. How to deal with them? I think that depends a lot on the reason the kid dropped out. Was he unchallenged? Did he feel inadequate due to his treatment by an instructor? Was he bullied? Was he the bully? Whatever the reason, it can be addressed. Certainly there are reasons the school has no control over, but some they do.
What about school police? That’s another issue that’s making waves. Apparently, 48% of schools have on-site, gun-toting police officers, who can and do make arrests for offences like cussing, bad attitude, even doodles depicting violence. And I mean arrested, handcuffs, dragged down to county lockup, strip-searched, the lot. Not all such incidents end this way, but a violent doodle does not mean the student intends to shoot up the school. One incident has an officer who observed students “walking back to class slowly” after lunch “encourage” them with pepper spray. Instead of causing them to run to class, they wound up in the hospital. So…a choice between kids being 30 seconds late to class or missing the rest of the school day? I know which the kids would choose, but I’m sure they’d rather have been in class than having capsaicin rinsed from their eyeballs. And we wonder why respect for police officers is on the decline, and why prison populations are on the rise. Oh, there are other reasons that can get me worked up, but I won’t get into them because they’re not quite so directly related.
Back to summer and extracurricular activities: some kids have amazing creativity locked up inside them. Caine Monroy built an arcade out of cardboard one summer, and it eventually became international news. Let the kids have lemonade stands without forcing them (or their parents) to get a business license or a food safety license. They’re doing it for fun, for something to do, and maybe to make enough money to buy a ticket to a theme park or something. Let them have some input into playground designs for local parks: they’re going to be the ones using them, after all. How about incentive programs at public libraries for reading books? The Book It! program I remember from childhood is still around, but that’s school-centered. And I’d regularly beg my parents to spend more money than they wanted to at the Scholastic book sales. I always had to put some books back. There are so many things for kids to do, some that we adults don’t have the time for anymore. We sometimes need to help them see that, though.
So, back to what I can do, what I’d like to do. My vision has always begun with a few nifty devices that pique the curiosity. A musical Tesla coil. A theremin. A trebuchet. A Rubins tube. A Van de Graaff generator. A tornado in a box. The Tower of Lire. Some require more work than others. All require initiative, and many are easier with help. But once these devices exist and installed in a static display, the fun begins. Showing people how they all work! Showing people the fun in non-Newtonian fluids, holography, internal combustion, and more. Inspire them to become teachers or scientists, or at the very least open their eyes to the amazing world around them.
Then they can join in open projects. Making slime, superballs, molding clay, slot cars, model railroads, to building Arduino-powered home automation systems, model rocketry, electrostatic speakers and more. The plans and instructions are out there, but I’ve not found a good repository for them, so I’d like to make one. And provide equipment from soldering stations to oscilloscopes and spectrum analyzers. Support would be on hand to make sure the equipment is being treated properly, to help place parts orders, etc. My domain is the electrical, and computer programming. Someone else should be around for the chemical, someone else for DIY car repair, etc. There are legal issues involved, but I’m currently far from having to deal with them, as it’s all just a dream right now. I would hope the project grows, and if Wichita truly can’t support it, well, someplace can, and I want to be in the middle of it.
This is my vision of an extracurricular, a summer or after-school field trip destination. Once it exists, it should be easier to build portable versions of everything to tote to schools for demonstrations, perhaps even a loaner program.